Childen's Hospital Boston
Visitantes extranjeroslínea de puntosIndicaciones
 búsqueda avanzada
Conózcanos Buscar un especialista Centros Empleos Sala de Noticias Donar Al
Servicios clinicos Para pacientes y familiares Para profesionales de la salud Investigación
Mi hijo tiene

Sala de prensa

Sala de prensa
Archive 2007
Archive 2006
Archive 2005
Archive 2004
Archive 2003
Archive 2002
Archive 2001
Archive 2000
Search News Room
Enviar esta página por email
Versión para imprimir
X
Sala de noticias

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE:
Monday, March 3, 2003, 12:01 a.m. ET
For Further Information:
Susan Craig
Relaciones públicas
617-355-6420
Un estudio del CHB demuestra que los niños pequeños con heridas graves en la cabeza cuyos padres no informan sobre el traumatismo o indican un traumatismo menor como causa de la lesión pueden ser víctimas de abuso
Findings Helpful for Physicians, Health Professionals In Identifying Child Abuse
Researchers in the Emergency Department at Children's Hospital Boston have found that infants who present for medical care with a serious head injury and no mention of trauma to explain the injury are highly likely to be victims of child abuse. These findings are expected to be helpful for physicians when assessing whether child abuse is a factor in head injuries. The study's strength is that it validates some existing presumptions that physicians use to identify abuse. The study is published in the March issue of the journal Pediatrics.

The researchers found that when a child presented with neurological symptoms after head injury and parents or caregivers reported no history of trauma, such as a fall or being hit with a hard object, that the injury was highly likely to be caused by abuse. In medical terms, the history is the initial report of what happened prior to injury.

"In every single case where there was no history of trauma and the child ended up with neurological damage, it was later determined that the injury was caused by abuse," says Joeli Hettler, MD, assistant in Emergency Medicine and lead author of the study. "Either the parents did not 'make up a story' of how their kids were hurt, or their initial claims of not knowing what happened or of a minor injury, did not coincide with the observed injuries."

In order to assess whether abuse has occurred, physicians evaluate medical test results and take a history (an account of the patient's past and present health and family and personal background). Children's researchers set out to assess this history -- or report of what happened -- to see if it could effectively predict whether a child's injury was caused by abuse.

To do this, researchers looked retrospectively at 200 patient charts of children from birth to age 3 who were admitted to Children's with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage or serious bleeding in the head from 1993-2000. They looked at medical information such as patient's neurological status, results of radiological studies, and ophthalmologic exam findings to classify patients as either ''Definite Abuse'' or ''Not Definite Abuse.'' They then went back and looked at initial presenting histories for these patients so that they could assess whether those histories (the information that caregivers or parents provided) were a reliable predictor of Definite Abuse.

Additionally, researchers found that among the subgroup of patients with persistent neurologic abnormality at hospital discharge, those who did not have a history of high-impact (defined as a fall greater than 3 feet) trauma were all victims of child abuse. The researchers combined cases that reported no history of trauma with those that reported a history of low-impact (defined as a fall from less than 3 feet) trauma and found that, in both cases, these reports were predictive for abuse. This is consistent with data from a prior Children's Hospital study that showed that low-impact trauma is unlikely to result in neurological impairment.

The third relevant finding was that when caregivers or parents attributed injuries to their own vigorous attempts to resuscitate a child, abuse was the cause of injuries in every case. Lastly, in cases where parents changed their stories or whose reported histories changed over the course of their treatment at the hospital, abuse was again determined to be the cause of injury in all cases.

''These findings underscore how important it is for caregivers to take accurate histories so that the likelihood of abuse can most accurately be assessed,'' says Andrea. Vandeven, MD, MPH, assistant in Medicine and director of Children's Child Protection Team. ''These guideposts can be useful for caregivers who are unfortunately put in the situation of assessing whether abuse has occurred all too often.''

Over 3 million cases of child abuse and neglect are reported annually, a rate of 44 per 1000 children. Each year, 160,000 children suffer severe or life-threatening injuries and 1,000 to 2,000 children die as a result of abuse. Physical abuse is the leading cause of serious head injury in infants. Although physical abuse in the past has been a diagnosis of exclusion, data regarding the nature and frequency of head trauma consistently support the need for a presumption of child abuse when a child younger than 1 year has suffered an intracranial injury. Head injuries are the leading cause of traumatic death and the leading cause of child abuse fatalities.

Previous research has shown that serious injuries in infants, particularly those that result in death, are rarely accidental unless there is another clear explanation, such as trauma from a motor vehicle crash. Billmire and Meyers found that when uncomplicated documented severe trauma such as that resulting in skull fractures were excluded, 95 percent of serious intracranial injuries and 64 percent of all head injuries in infants younger than 1 year were attributable to child abuse. Bruce and Zimmerman documented that 80 percent of deaths from head trauma in infants and children younger than 2 years were the result of non-accidental trauma.

[Above two paragraphs are attributable to the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, 2000-2001.]

Children's Hospital Boston is the nation's premier pediatric medical center. ChildrenÕs has been ranked #1 among the country's pediatric hospitals in U.S. News and World Report for 13 years in a row. Fundado en 1869 como un hospital para niños con una capacidad de 20 camas, en la actualidad es un centro integral con 300 camas dedicado a la atención médica de niños y adolescentes. Los valores de excelencia en la atención del paciente y la sensibilidad hacia las complejas necesidades y la diversidad de niños y familias son su fundamento. Children's Hospital Boston is the primary pediatric teaching affiliate of Harvard Medical School, home to the world's leading pediatric research enterprise, and the largest provider of health care to the children of Massachusetts. For more information about the hospital visit: www.childrenshospital.org.

###
X
Contáctenos Privacidad Accesibilidad Done ahora In English
Español Powered by MotionPoint